On Saturday I joined my local get-out-the-vote effort and spent a few hours knocking on doors for the New Hampshire Democratic Party. It was a beautiful day to be out walking around, and I enjoyed the activity. For me the central pleasure is having an excuse to engage strangers to talk about politics. I was armed with stickers on my shirt and a clipboard. Clearly, I was duly deputized to ring people’s doorbells and ask whoever answered how they thought their elected representative in congress are doing.
I was fun. And I learned a few things about my neighbors and fellow citizens.
One thing I learned is that people really don’t take care of their doorbells like they used to. Homes with functioning doorbells were a distinct minority. The other thing I learned was that the good people of Portsmouth appear to have better things to do on a gorgeous Saturday in August than staying home to attend to random canvassers like myself. Nobody was home.
But I was able to engage a few people. The people I spoke with were uniformly pleasant. They were not angry or overly disillusioned. Times are tough. But most places seem to be worse off than Portsmouth. Peoples’ concerns were general and economic. We’re in a hole, but the Democrats are the ones trying to dig us out. Even the guy who was “definitely not a fan” of the Democratic party applauded my civic-minded purpose.
Mostly, my mission was to not take more of people’s time than they seemed inclined to give. I wanted to be sure and state the names of our candidates. Representative Carol Shea-Porter. Paul Hodes for senate. Governor John Lynch. I was on their doorstep to extend a personal invitation to come on out and vote in November. I wished them a pleasant weekend and was on my way.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Saturday, August 21, 2010
A Year of Questions and Answers
When I started up this blog one year ago, I was moved to start writing again by two impulses:
Today, one year later, I’m not so worried about #1. Obama and the congressional Democrats have produced a number of substantial achievements. The passed health care reform. Affordable health insurance will soon be available to all Americans. Health care costs continue to rise. But there is a structure in place with which to contain them. Unemployment remains high and the economy weak. A series of stimulus bills and stabilizing measures have, at considerable cost, extended the safety net. We’ve turned an economy going off a cliff into one experiencing modest growth. We’re still stinging from the last financial crisis. But thanks to financial regulatory reform, we’ve put necessary structures in place to ward off the next one.
These are substantial accomplishments. Add in the victories of the past few weeks, and that’s a whole lot of leading and legislating. Throughout it all President Obama has been methodical, persistent, and deeply practical. Congressional Democrats have shown remarkable dedication, perseverance, good sense, and remained focused on tending to the people’s business.
These are politicians. Inevitably, their vanities and hypocrisies are going to be exposed. But when it really counts, Democrats have been kicking ass. In a big, messy, diverse, democracy -- this is as good as it gets.
The Republican party may have some competent governors and state legislatures out there. But at the national level, in congress, on the internet and air waves, they have been the model of dysfunction. After the disaster of the Bush administration, the GOP has not embraced governance as central to who they are or who they seek to be. They are dead weight on all policy discussions, on issues foreign and domestic. It’s all cable news nonsense and culture wars.
It is with weary dismay that I greet the conventional wisdom for the upcoming elections. The Democrats are disillusioned. Republicans are fired up hoping to make some big gains. Why? Why don’t the Democrats get credit for their accomplishments? What does anyone hope to accomplish by voting Republican in this cycle?
The party in power tends to take a beating in mid-term elections. And when unemployment is high, incumbents take the hit there too. So, maybe that’s the whole story. When times are bad we vote for the “other guy” -- regardless if we think the current guy is doing anything wrong. Even if we don’t think the new guy can do any better. Even if a Republican administration got us into this mess.
I can understand it at a macro level, but the expected Republican resurgence perplexes me when it comes to individuals. I can see why people who aren’t paying attention would go with their anti-incumbent-gut. But I don’t get the anti-incumbent activists. If you’re active and plugged in enough to be commenting on message boards, arguing on the forums, crashing town hall meetings, or attending a Tea Party rally -- what do you want? What do you think Republicans in power will do? Should do?
That’s the question that drove motivation #2 above. After a year of searching, I’m frustrated by a lack of answers. My efforts haven’t been exhaustive. But they have been sincere. I’ve been to a health care town hall, done battle and probed on Politico, whipped out the gauntlet and slapped a few faces, and attended a local Tea Party rally. I’ve approached each engagement with the same questions. What do you want? What are you mad about?
I’ve got nothing. I still don’t understand it. I’ve learned that “Well, what do you think the president should be doing differently?” is a pretty reliable conversation killer. I suppose the non-answer is it’s own answer.
Is it all just tribalism? Just rooting for your team? Maybe it is only wonk-wannabees like me who expect a system of cause and effect. Maybe the ones that are the most engaged in our political discourse are just the members of the tribe prone to the most chest-thumping.
Here’s the bottom line:
We are the public. We get to vote. There’s an election this November. That’s the only poll that counts. Show up. Vote for the Democrats. They’ve earned it.
- The country has problems. With a new president and substantial Democratic majorities we had a chance to address those problems. But we seemed to be blowing that chance.
- Despite the depth of our woes, there were a whole lot of people who wanted to the president and the congress to fail. I wanted to figure out why.
Today, one year later, I’m not so worried about #1. Obama and the congressional Democrats have produced a number of substantial achievements. The passed health care reform. Affordable health insurance will soon be available to all Americans. Health care costs continue to rise. But there is a structure in place with which to contain them. Unemployment remains high and the economy weak. A series of stimulus bills and stabilizing measures have, at considerable cost, extended the safety net. We’ve turned an economy going off a cliff into one experiencing modest growth. We’re still stinging from the last financial crisis. But thanks to financial regulatory reform, we’ve put necessary structures in place to ward off the next one.
These are substantial accomplishments. Add in the victories of the past few weeks, and that’s a whole lot of leading and legislating. Throughout it all President Obama has been methodical, persistent, and deeply practical. Congressional Democrats have shown remarkable dedication, perseverance, good sense, and remained focused on tending to the people’s business.
These are politicians. Inevitably, their vanities and hypocrisies are going to be exposed. But when it really counts, Democrats have been kicking ass. In a big, messy, diverse, democracy -- this is as good as it gets.
The Republican party may have some competent governors and state legislatures out there. But at the national level, in congress, on the internet and air waves, they have been the model of dysfunction. After the disaster of the Bush administration, the GOP has not embraced governance as central to who they are or who they seek to be. They are dead weight on all policy discussions, on issues foreign and domestic. It’s all cable news nonsense and culture wars.
It is with weary dismay that I greet the conventional wisdom for the upcoming elections. The Democrats are disillusioned. Republicans are fired up hoping to make some big gains. Why? Why don’t the Democrats get credit for their accomplishments? What does anyone hope to accomplish by voting Republican in this cycle?
The party in power tends to take a beating in mid-term elections. And when unemployment is high, incumbents take the hit there too. So, maybe that’s the whole story. When times are bad we vote for the “other guy” -- regardless if we think the current guy is doing anything wrong. Even if we don’t think the new guy can do any better. Even if a Republican administration got us into this mess.
I can understand it at a macro level, but the expected Republican resurgence perplexes me when it comes to individuals. I can see why people who aren’t paying attention would go with their anti-incumbent-gut. But I don’t get the anti-incumbent activists. If you’re active and plugged in enough to be commenting on message boards, arguing on the forums, crashing town hall meetings, or attending a Tea Party rally -- what do you want? What do you think Republicans in power will do? Should do?
That’s the question that drove motivation #2 above. After a year of searching, I’m frustrated by a lack of answers. My efforts haven’t been exhaustive. But they have been sincere. I’ve been to a health care town hall, done battle and probed on Politico, whipped out the gauntlet and slapped a few faces, and attended a local Tea Party rally. I’ve approached each engagement with the same questions. What do you want? What are you mad about?
I’ve got nothing. I still don’t understand it. I’ve learned that “Well, what do you think the president should be doing differently?” is a pretty reliable conversation killer. I suppose the non-answer is it’s own answer.
Is it all just tribalism? Just rooting for your team? Maybe it is only wonk-wannabees like me who expect a system of cause and effect. Maybe the ones that are the most engaged in our political discourse are just the members of the tribe prone to the most chest-thumping.
Here’s the bottom line:
We are the public. We get to vote. There’s an election this November. That’s the only poll that counts. Show up. Vote for the Democrats. They’ve earned it.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Newsweek and the Media Landscape
This week Newsweek magazine was sold to a 91 year old stereo magnate. The sale price is said to be $1. The sale of the iconic magazine is an interesting reflection of the strange media landscape we’re in today.
I grew up with Newsweek. It was always on the coffee table in our home and I was a regular reader. When I went off to college I got my own subscription. For a number of years, Newsweek was a central conduit to my sense of what was going on in the world.
These days I’ve a voracious blog and on-line news reader. We still have a subscription and I still read it. But Newsweek is but one news source among many. I approved when Newsweek transitioned away from a summary of the week’s events format and went with more long form investigation and analysis. But I can see why the magazine would be struggling to hold onto advertisers and subscribers. It’s not dead. It is on life support.
Why pay for a print magazine when there is an abundance of free news at our fingertips? Why wait a week for news analysis when there’s a perpetual stream on the internet, and river of information there for the drinking?
The economic problems of the print news business is not surprising. As I think of my media consumption habits I see similar trends everywhere. I get my news and analysis on the internet. I spend my days streaming great, free, advertisement-free, internet radio. My books come from the public library. Movies arrive via Netflix. Games are downloaded at deep discount from Steam or for a dollar in the iTunes app store.
My life is spent saturated in media, but I don’t see many advertisements, and don’t pay much money for any of it. The old business models are crumbling. What is going to replace them? It’s going to get harder and harder to make money as a media producer.
It’s a great time to be to a consumer. I have more access to media of all kinds than ever before. There’s no shortage in sight. There are more great music, movies, books, news, and games than ever. An embarrassment of media riches is everywhere and there for the consuming.
I just don’t see how anyone is making money off it.
I grew up with Newsweek. It was always on the coffee table in our home and I was a regular reader. When I went off to college I got my own subscription. For a number of years, Newsweek was a central conduit to my sense of what was going on in the world.
These days I’ve a voracious blog and on-line news reader. We still have a subscription and I still read it. But Newsweek is but one news source among many. I approved when Newsweek transitioned away from a summary of the week’s events format and went with more long form investigation and analysis. But I can see why the magazine would be struggling to hold onto advertisers and subscribers. It’s not dead. It is on life support.
Why pay for a print magazine when there is an abundance of free news at our fingertips? Why wait a week for news analysis when there’s a perpetual stream on the internet, and river of information there for the drinking?
The economic problems of the print news business is not surprising. As I think of my media consumption habits I see similar trends everywhere. I get my news and analysis on the internet. I spend my days streaming great, free, advertisement-free, internet radio. My books come from the public library. Movies arrive via Netflix. Games are downloaded at deep discount from Steam or for a dollar in the iTunes app store.
My life is spent saturated in media, but I don’t see many advertisements, and don’t pay much money for any of it. The old business models are crumbling. What is going to replace them? It’s going to get harder and harder to make money as a media producer.
It’s a great time to be to a consumer. I have more access to media of all kinds than ever before. There’s no shortage in sight. There are more great music, movies, books, news, and games than ever. An embarrassment of media riches is everywhere and there for the consuming.
I just don’t see how anyone is making money off it.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
How to Restore American Democracy on January 3, 2011
Last Tuesday the Republicans in the Senate blocked passage of the DISCLOSE act. The vote “failed” with 57 votes in favor and 41 votes against.
The DISCLOSE act is a response the recent Supreme Court decision regarding campaign finance reform. The US Supreme Court ruled that corporations have right to spend unlimited amounts of money to influencing elections. The DISCLOSE act would require that these corporations do us citizens the kindness of identifying themselves. The corporations could still spend all the money they want to buy elections, they would just have to tell us who was doing it.
Apparently, this is something the GOP now opposes.
Voting against the measure was each and every Republican senator - including New Hampshire’s Senator Gregg. Including the New England “moderates” of Brown, Snowe, and Collins. And including senator John McCain, the author and one-time champion of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.
Adding to the absurdity is the fact that the bill is supported by 59 senators and opposed by only 41. Thanks to the insane rules of the US Senate, they need to 60 votes to break the filibuster. Why would the Republicans unite to filibuster this particular piece of legislation? That is what they do. They filibuster everything.
The 60 votes-to-break-filibuster business was a hot topic during the health care reform debate. During that debate is was suggested that the senate rules are not absurd, and that the filibuster is there to insure that the voice of the minority is heard on important topics. But that’s not how it works and that is not how the filibuster is used.
Republicans have employed the filibuster more than 105 times during this congress. They filibustered health care reform, financial regulation reform, economic stimulus, extending unemployment benefits, judicial nominations, federal appointments, cutting taxes for small businesses, and now, corporate campaign disclosure rules. They filibustered everything.
No matter what the topic, the Republicans are opposed. Not only will the vote against, but they are opposed to even letting the vote happen at all. During the Obama presidency use of the filibuster has jumped dramatically. Its use has gone from the extraordinary to the routine.
The perpetual filibuster votes requirement has, amidst turmoil and a vast array problems that require action, turned the legislative process to a slow slog. Important laws have been distorted, delayed, water-down, or killed by a super-majority requirement for each item of business.
This is not your father’s filibuster. They do not involve a Mr. Smithian stand or principle. They do not involve feats of endurance or endless inspirations speeches. The modern Senate filibuster is a parliamentary gimmick where the speech itself is not required and can not be compelled.
The GOP found a loophole in the rules. They broke the game.
It is frustrating to watch a duly-elected legislative majority try to confront our nations problems only to be thwarted by the minority. It is tragic to see our problems fester from abuse of protocol and cruel political calculation.
This can change.
The US Constitution makes clear that the Senate can establish its own procedures. At the start of a new congress, a simple majority can establish a new set of rules. The 112th Congress will be seated on January 3rd, 2011. On that day, they can break the filibuster once and for all.
The DISCLOSE act is a response the recent Supreme Court decision regarding campaign finance reform. The US Supreme Court ruled that corporations have right to spend unlimited amounts of money to influencing elections. The DISCLOSE act would require that these corporations do us citizens the kindness of identifying themselves. The corporations could still spend all the money they want to buy elections, they would just have to tell us who was doing it.
Apparently, this is something the GOP now opposes.
Voting against the measure was each and every Republican senator - including New Hampshire’s Senator Gregg. Including the New England “moderates” of Brown, Snowe, and Collins. And including senator John McCain, the author and one-time champion of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.
Adding to the absurdity is the fact that the bill is supported by 59 senators and opposed by only 41. Thanks to the insane rules of the US Senate, they need to 60 votes to break the filibuster. Why would the Republicans unite to filibuster this particular piece of legislation? That is what they do. They filibuster everything.
The 60 votes-to-break-filibuster business was a hot topic during the health care reform debate. During that debate is was suggested that the senate rules are not absurd, and that the filibuster is there to insure that the voice of the minority is heard on important topics. But that’s not how it works and that is not how the filibuster is used.
Republicans have employed the filibuster more than 105 times during this congress. They filibustered health care reform, financial regulation reform, economic stimulus, extending unemployment benefits, judicial nominations, federal appointments, cutting taxes for small businesses, and now, corporate campaign disclosure rules. They filibustered everything.
No matter what the topic, the Republicans are opposed. Not only will the vote against, but they are opposed to even letting the vote happen at all. During the Obama presidency use of the filibuster has jumped dramatically. Its use has gone from the extraordinary to the routine.
The perpetual filibuster votes requirement has, amidst turmoil and a vast array problems that require action, turned the legislative process to a slow slog. Important laws have been distorted, delayed, water-down, or killed by a super-majority requirement for each item of business.
This is not your father’s filibuster. They do not involve a Mr. Smithian stand or principle. They do not involve feats of endurance or endless inspirations speeches. The modern Senate filibuster is a parliamentary gimmick where the speech itself is not required and can not be compelled.
The GOP found a loophole in the rules. They broke the game.
It is frustrating to watch a duly-elected legislative majority try to confront our nations problems only to be thwarted by the minority. It is tragic to see our problems fester from abuse of protocol and cruel political calculation.
This can change.
The US Constitution makes clear that the Senate can establish its own procedures. At the start of a new congress, a simple majority can establish a new set of rules. The 112th Congress will be seated on January 3rd, 2011. On that day, they can break the filibuster once and for all.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Live Free, New Hampshire
Today's front page of the Boston Globe has an article on the branding of New Hampshire (featuring photos of Portsmouth, naturally). Since our big stone face fell down, apparently there have been some problems coming up with icons and slogans that capture capture the essence of New Hampshire.
Vermont has its cows, farmers, and hippies. Maine has the coastline and Lobsters. Massachusetts has it's history and dynasties. New Hampshire has a little of all of that, but less that is distinctly its own. When the West Wing was on the air New Hampshire native President Bartlet was always in search of New Hampshire maple syrup. We can relate.
The Floridian firm that has been tasked with the re-branding effort is steering clear of the state slogan: Live Free or Die. "We're not touching that." And that is why they fail.
The one thing that unifies us as a state is our willingness to deploy our motto at every opportunity and for every purpose. It's an echo of our patriotic past and present. We're a state with no sales tax, no income tax, no motorcycle helmets, gay marriage and plenty of firearms and fireworks. We have beautiful mountains, trails, ski slopes, and historical areas. And we have industry and entrepreneurial spirit. There's opportunity here. People have the means to enjoy it all and there's much to enjoy. New Hampshire is also famous for its importance in primary politics. But its citizens are fundamentally skeptical and unpredictable.
Our independence is our unifying theme.
Live free, New Hampshire. There is no alternative.
Vermont has its cows, farmers, and hippies. Maine has the coastline and Lobsters. Massachusetts has it's history and dynasties. New Hampshire has a little of all of that, but less that is distinctly its own. When the West Wing was on the air New Hampshire native President Bartlet was always in search of New Hampshire maple syrup. We can relate.
The Floridian firm that has been tasked with the re-branding effort is steering clear of the state slogan: Live Free or Die. "We're not touching that." And that is why they fail.
The one thing that unifies us as a state is our willingness to deploy our motto at every opportunity and for every purpose. It's an echo of our patriotic past and present. We're a state with no sales tax, no income tax, no motorcycle helmets, gay marriage and plenty of firearms and fireworks. We have beautiful mountains, trails, ski slopes, and historical areas. And we have industry and entrepreneurial spirit. There's opportunity here. People have the means to enjoy it all and there's much to enjoy. New Hampshire is also famous for its importance in primary politics. But its citizens are fundamentally skeptical and unpredictable.
Our independence is our unifying theme.
Live free, New Hampshire. There is no alternative.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
On the Bright Side
Last Thursday my parents came to town to see Isaac's 4th grade track meet. It's about a 3 hour trip from their place in Vermont to Portsmouth. I've yet to witness one of these meets myself. But I understand my son's contribution is a minute or two of middle-of-the-pack jogging and jumping. Under the best of circumstances, the trip itself was a heroic act of grand-parental involvement.
As it turned out, these were not the best of circumstances. The meet was rained out. There was no competitive elementary running to be witnessed. My parents joined my sister for a short shopping trip with a cranky and screaming baby. They joined us for a quick dinner. Then they got back on the road for the 3 hour return trip.
On their way home, in the darkness on Vermont's route 2 their car hit a moose. The moose had been struck and killed by the car preceding them, totaling the car and moose. My parents ran into and over the large carcass lying in the road. They weren't hurt. Their car was not so fortunate.
The day after their 9 hour odyssey to witness an event that didn't take place - after a morning spent cleaning the blood and gore off their banged-up and undrivable car - Mom had this to report:
As it turned out, these were not the best of circumstances. The meet was rained out. There was no competitive elementary running to be witnessed. My parents joined my sister for a short shopping trip with a cranky and screaming baby. They joined us for a quick dinner. Then they got back on the road for the 3 hour return trip.
On their way home, in the darkness on Vermont's route 2 their car hit a moose. The moose had been struck and killed by the car preceding them, totaling the car and moose. My parents ran into and over the large carcass lying in the road. They weren't hurt. Their car was not so fortunate.
The day after their 9 hour odyssey to witness an event that didn't take place - after a morning spent cleaning the blood and gore off their banged-up and undrivable car - Mom had this to report:
We are thankful that no one was hurt. The female driver of the first car (whose car was probably totalled) was much more interested in whether or not she could get the moose meat than she was about her car. That's Vermonters for you!
Sorry that you didn't get to see the moose... but believe me, it's not the best way to have a sighting.
Thanks for the fun day yesterday and the slice of life of each of your families. We loved it in spite of the rain, crying baby, and cancelled track meet!
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Happy Birthday to Me
It was my birthday yesterday. 38. Birthdays are a good time to have a few drinks, sit back, and think about where you are and where you've come from- the years gone by and the ones that lie ahead. It's been a good year. It's been a good life.
I am one of the most fortunate people anywhere. Ever.
I have been blessed with the good fortune of being born, a human being, on this earth, in the United States of America. Today, in the year 2010, I find myself in world of privilege, opportunity, and material comfort. The world has provided an abundance of games and music, sights and sounds, wonderful people and fantastic foods. My daily cares and concerns are generally small and petty. Few of them are worth recounting. Most are easily resolved.
My job is lucrative enough to provide a comfortable life for my family. It is stimulating enough to be gratifying. My colleagues are pleasant and competent. My work keeps me busy but doesn't overwhelm my life - leaving me time to spend with family and pursue my interests, hobbies, and amusements.
Every year my two sons grow more interesting, more confident, and more independent. I see myself in them and see them growing into themselves. This is the 23rd birthday I've celebrated with my wonderful and lovely wife, Christine. That's a lot of years. But time has spared us the worst of its ravaging. With a little regular maintenance, we both carry our years well. I am fortunate to share my life with such a wonderful wife, mother and friend - someone who complements and supports me. I am blessed to have someone who tolerates my eccentricities, diversions, and perpetual distractions.
In the past year, thanks to the technological marvels of our time, I have been able to reconnect with a great many people. There are so many old friends, lost classmates, physically distant relatives, kindred spirits, and interesting souls met along the way. Maybe we get together once or twice over months and years. Many of you I had no expectation of ever hearing from again. Now, from afar, I get a rolling window into your world. I can see the snapshots of your life, share in your stories, banter a bit, and follow your ideas and interests.
This year also marked, for me, a return to writing. It has been a pleasure to take the thoughts rattling around my head and find a home for them. My natural state is introverted and standoffish. So I'm enjoying this little soapbox. I like being able to share my views with friends, acquaintances, and a few strangers. I appreciate you for taking the time to consider my musings.
The year to come holds great promise. Perhaps my little company stands on the financial success. Perhaps another long-held dream will bear some delightful fruit. Whatever comes, I will share it with wonderful family and friends.
It is a happy day. Thank you for being part of it.
I am one of the most fortunate people anywhere. Ever.
I have been blessed with the good fortune of being born, a human being, on this earth, in the United States of America. Today, in the year 2010, I find myself in world of privilege, opportunity, and material comfort. The world has provided an abundance of games and music, sights and sounds, wonderful people and fantastic foods. My daily cares and concerns are generally small and petty. Few of them are worth recounting. Most are easily resolved.
My job is lucrative enough to provide a comfortable life for my family. It is stimulating enough to be gratifying. My colleagues are pleasant and competent. My work keeps me busy but doesn't overwhelm my life - leaving me time to spend with family and pursue my interests, hobbies, and amusements.
Every year my two sons grow more interesting, more confident, and more independent. I see myself in them and see them growing into themselves. This is the 23rd birthday I've celebrated with my wonderful and lovely wife, Christine. That's a lot of years. But time has spared us the worst of its ravaging. With a little regular maintenance, we both carry our years well. I am fortunate to share my life with such a wonderful wife, mother and friend - someone who complements and supports me. I am blessed to have someone who tolerates my eccentricities, diversions, and perpetual distractions.
In the past year, thanks to the technological marvels of our time, I have been able to reconnect with a great many people. There are so many old friends, lost classmates, physically distant relatives, kindred spirits, and interesting souls met along the way. Maybe we get together once or twice over months and years. Many of you I had no expectation of ever hearing from again. Now, from afar, I get a rolling window into your world. I can see the snapshots of your life, share in your stories, banter a bit, and follow your ideas and interests.
This year also marked, for me, a return to writing. It has been a pleasure to take the thoughts rattling around my head and find a home for them. My natural state is introverted and standoffish. So I'm enjoying this little soapbox. I like being able to share my views with friends, acquaintances, and a few strangers. I appreciate you for taking the time to consider my musings.
The year to come holds great promise. Perhaps my little company stands on the financial success. Perhaps another long-held dream will bear some delightful fruit. Whatever comes, I will share it with wonderful family and friends.
It is a happy day. Thank you for being part of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)